Are you up for a wild ride through shark-infested cornfields? Make sure you're buckled in because "Sharks of the Corn" promises a wild ride of horror as well as comedy. It was written and directed by the legendary Tim Ritter, this ultra low-budget flick draws on Stephen King's famous "Children of the Corn" (1984) which transforms into a hilarious, bizarre humorous spoof that'll leave at a loss for words and swaying on the floor in laughter.
This is a Cornfield Carnival of Chaos
In the first scene, an apparently innocent corn field "Sharks of the Corn" reveals its quirky character. We are introduced to Gary and Susan the two main characters, who rapidly fade away into the background after the film has veered away in unexpected directions. The plot weaves together horror elements and an array of subplots to create a wonderful blend that can be called a cornfield carnival of chaos.
An Phobiacally ill-tempered Shark Enthusiast
It's Teddy Bo Lucas, a figure who provides an added degree of chaos to an already confusing story. The shark-loving psychopath has an uncanny fascination with these underwater predators. Just as if the sight of sharks in fields were not enough of a bizarre sight, Teddy goes on to an entire new level after the shocking crime is committed within his hotel room. A shocking twist in the story sets the stage to a frenzy full of intrigue, suspicion and awe.
Inconfusion Cults And Sharks
The plot becomes more intricate as authorities blame poor Gary for Susan's murder, yet despite the lack of motive. The cult of sharks emerges as a peculiar subplot. We are introduced to a world where cornfields and Shark worship meet. As if it's not going to get any more crazy and more twisted, two creepy burglars attempt to steal a baby shark from this group of people. It's a chaotic blend of humor and horror that will keep readers on edge.
Critiques as well as Comic Relief
Although "Sharks of the Corn" provides an original and refreshing encounter, it's not completely without its shortcomings. The movie frequently leaps between different characters and scenes, leading some viewers to feel confused and trying to figure out its multiple plots. It's a conscious (blog) choice of stylistic design that enhances the spoof style of the film however, it might not be anyone's cup.
The production values in the film are intentionally low as is the acting, which falls into the category of unreliable. But, in the midst in which performances are mediocre, Steve Guynn shines through with the laudable character he portrays, being the character rather than performing (click info) scripts. It's the rare gem of authenticity in a sea of over-the-top performances.
Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines
"Sharks of the Corn" has a budget-friendly style with basic effects, but they have a certain charm. The majority of the shark attacks are hilariously rendered by hand-made puppets, which adds an element of absurdity the movie. This bizarre plotline, which revolves around a shark's cult's strategy to revive the goddess of sharks this is where the film is truly able to unleash its creative. In reality, though, this inventiveness often does not translate into an engaging viewing experience.
Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional
One area where "Sharks of the Corn" has a problem is in the cinematography. Visuals and framing are a bit rushed, coming to appear amateurish, devoid of any polish or finesse normally found on mainstream horror films. While this may be intentional so that the film maintains a budget-conscious look but it can affect the quality of the experience.
It's a wrap "Sharks of the Corn" may be an acquired one. It's slow and boring series of episodes that may be difficult to understand of. The film's low production costs confusion in plotlines and doubtful acting skills could deter those who want a more professional horror-comedy. However, for people who enjoy terrible films to entertain "Sharks of the Corn" doesn't deliver all the laughs you'd expected.Final Rating The Final Score: One "Stock Footage Overlay" Out of Five
A poor quality video, recording, acting and editing skills "Sharks of the Corn" can't quite reach the threshold. Though it's an excellent and funny spoof that is wildly entertaining, it's unable to produce an immersive and satisfying user experience. As the reviewer, I finish with an amusing note: films, much like corn, can only be improved when they include explosions. However, "Sharks of the Corn" hasn't made the cut.